Se uno circondava il suo vicino (con campi) da tre lati, e recintava il primo, il secondo e il terzo, lui (il vicino) non era obbligato (a condividere le spese di scherma), [per lui (il primo) lo faceva non lo avvantaggia affatto, la sua terra è ancora aperta. Ma se lui (il primo) ha recintato il quarto lato, nel qual caso lo avvantaggia sicuramente, lui (il vicino) è obbligato a pagare, nominalmente, la metà del costo delle canne (cioè di una recinzione), ma non la metà di le sue (le prime spese. Per lui (il vicino) può dirgli: Per me è sufficiente una spartitrave e non voglio le spese di una recinzione di pietra.] R. Yossi dice: Se lui (il primo) nacque e recintò il quarto (lato), tutto gli fu imposto (il vicino) [cioè la metà delle spese di scherma effettive. E questa è la differenza tra il primo tanna e R. Yossi. L'halachah è in accordo con R Yossi. E 'ovvio che se quello circondato recintava il quarto lato, rendendo evidente che favorisce la scherma del suo vicino, tutto gli viene imposto e paga metà delle spese del suo vicino.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
אין מחייבין אותו – for it doesn’t benefit him at all, for his land is still open. But, if he (i.e., the other partner) fenced in the fourth side, for now, it absolutely benefits him, we require him to pay one-half the cost of the purchase at the cheapest rate. But not half of his outlay, for he says to him: For me it is enough for me with a partition of reeds, and I don’t need an outlay of a stone fence.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
Introduction
Mishnah three discusses a person who builds a fence partially around another person’s property and wishes that person to share in the costs of the fence.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
מגלגלין עליו את הכל – one-half of his outlay according to what he fenced in. And there is the difference between the first Tanna/teacher and Rabbi Yosi. And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yosi. And we don’t have to say if he himself is the one who fenced in the fourth side, for he revealed his intention that he is pleased with what his fellow fenced in that we make him bear the expenses for the fencing in of everything, and he pays his fellow half of his outlays.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
If a man’s land surrounded his fellow’s land on three sides, and he fenced it on the first and the second and the third sides, they do not obligate him [to share in the costs]. Rabbi Yose says: “If he rose a built a fence on the fourth side, they obligate him to share in all of the costs.” In the scenario discussed in this mishnah Reuven owns three fields which surround Shimon’s fields on three of its four sides. If Reuven were to fence in all three of his fields he would have built a fence around three sides of Shimon’s fields. Since this fence does not totally surround Shimon’s field, Reuven cannot claim that Shimon benefited from the field and should therefore share in the costs. Rabbi Yose adds that if Shimon were to fence in four sides, he would thereby show that he wished to have his field fenced in. In that case he is obligated to share in the costs of all of the fences, since he now benefits from them all.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
Questions for Further Thought: • If Reuven owns fields surrounding all four sides of Shimon’s field and he puts a fence around all of them, will Shimon have to share in the costs?
